From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11795-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23737 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2002 18:38:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23691 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 18:38:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 18:38:11 -0000
Received: from cse.cygnus.com (cse.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.236])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09083;
	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by cse.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0AIabC04931;
	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:36:37 -0700
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1020110183637.ZM4930@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
        "Re: [PATCH] fix inferior_pid argument for arm-netbsd" (Jan 10,  5:58pm)
References: <200201101758.RAA26999@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0.1 13Jan97 Caldera)
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix inferior_pid argument for arm-netbsd
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2

On Jan 10,  5:58pm, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> > > On Jan 9,  1:38pm, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 	* armnbsd-nat.c (fetch_inferior_registers): Change inferior_pid -> 
> > > > 	inferior_ptid.pid.
> > > 
> > > Please don't do it this way.  Use the accessor functions instead.  I've
> > > looked over your patch, and in each case, you can simply use
> > > 
> > >     ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid)
> > > 
> > 
> > Ah!  I wasn't aware of the accessor functions.  In fact, most targets are 
> > using the macro GETPID (from defs.h).  I've fixed the code to use that.
> 
> I haven't heard anything further.  Can I assume this is acceptable now, or 
> do I have to go into limbo for another month?

It's fine.  Check it in.

Kevin