From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9247 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 00:45:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9238 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 00:45:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.dberlin.org) (151.204.251.253) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2002 00:45:49 -0000 Received: by www.dberlin.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id B5F161075A27; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 20:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.c++/local.exp: add pr numbers From: Daniel Berlin To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200204132206.g3DM6NE30493@duracef.shout.net> References: <200204132206.g3DM6NE30493@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1018745148.4364.18.camel@dberlin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 18:06, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Andrew Cagney writes: > > Suggest just ``(gdb/482)''. It appears GCC really is switching to > > Bugzilla so ``gnats'' may one day not apply. > > I thought about that. When we switch to Bugzilla, is the bug still > going to be #482? Yes. Bugzilla bug ids for gnats bugs will be the same as they were for gnats. > I like "gnats:gdb/482" because it identifies the bug > reporting system that actually contains the bug. > > I don't know if there's a standard way of citing bug reports ... > do you want to promulgate one? Um, if you simply write something fitting the regex bug(\s|%\#)*(\d+) , bugzilla will make it link to the bug in question. If you want to reference a comment in the same bug, simply writing something fitting comment(\s|%\#)*(\d+) will link to that comment And combining the two, with an optional comma bug(\s|%\#)*(\d+),?\s*comment\s*(\s|%\#)(\d+) will link to to a specific comment in a specific bug. This is the basic standard for citing bug reports (Also FYI: There is no official standard way for citing them in "real" documents, other than using the proper citation form for their URL's or something.) I'm not going to modify the bugzilla source (to recognize any other citation forms, as this highlighting is done in a routine used all over the place (and thus, it's harder to verify a given regex does what you expect in all cases), and I am specifically trying to avoid making any changes to the perl source that can be avoided (the templates are expected to be changed). > > Michael C