From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22229 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 22:12:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22208 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2002 22:12:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (64.246.6.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2002 22:12:02 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (pool-151-204-251-136.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.251.136]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by dberlin.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g33MBxm12811; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:11:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI From: Daniel Berlin To: Jim Blandy Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20020403000242.A31097@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:12:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1017871920.12178.25.camel@danberlin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:05, Jim Blandy wrote: > > To get back to the issue at hand: > > Daniel B., if you can tweak the Dwarf expression evaluator into a form > that Uli is willing to incorporate into his libdwarf, then that's a > pretty good test of its indpendence from GDB's internals, in my view. Let me ping him and see if he's still actually working on this stuff. In the meanwhile, i'll modify it to the structure you had posted earlier. > > Actually changing GDB to use (anybody's) libdwarf is a whole separate > project --- it could be worth pursuing, but it's not our (or at least > my) top priority.