From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Buettner To: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What is on the 5.1 branch; Was: [rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:52:00 -0000 Message-id: <1010820182911.ZM15058@ocotillo.lan> References: <3B7EAF09.4010801@cygnus.com> <3B7ED838.70607@cygnus.com> <9743-Sun19Aug2001093055+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3B80A35B.3060504@cygnus.com> <7263-Mon20Aug2001090940+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010819231747.A15746@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00241.html On Aug 19, 11:17pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I tend to date ChangeLog entries with the day the patch was last > modified, not the day it was committed. Do others prefer to keep the > changelog dates relative to the day the source changed? I prefer to see ChangeLog entries that reflect the date of the commit for the reasons Eli mentioned. The only exception to this is that when merging changes from the mainline to the branch, I'd rather see the dates stay the same as listed in the mainline to make it easier to see which changes have been brought in... Kevin