From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa(top.c)] catch_exceptions()
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:52:00 -0000
Message-id: <1010815165226.ZM31992@ocotillo.lan>
References: <3B783BC9.8030603@cygnus.com> <ac131313@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00180.html

On Aug 13,  4:42pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> The attatched patch impements a successor to catch_errors() - 
> catch_exceptions().
[...]
> Comments.  Any preference for the other.  Ok for top.c?

I reviewed your patch and it looks fine to me.  I wonder though if
it might not be better to implement catch_errors() in terms of
catch_exceptions() in order to make sure that the new code gets
thoroughly tested from the outset.

Kevin