From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>, kevinb@cygnus.com
Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFA]: Skip mi test when UI_OUT but mi support isn't present
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:14:00 -0000
Message-id: <1010328211356.ZM7156@ocotillo.lan>
References: <200101202227.f0KMRle04985@delius.kettenis.local> <3A6AF73A.A3E2CEB@redhat.com> <1010328205333.ZM7064@ocotillo.lan> <200103282106.f2SL6oE02040@delius.kettenis.local> <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00530.html

On Mar 28, 11:06pm, Mark Kettenis wrote:

>    Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:53:33 -0700
>    From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
> 
>    What ever became of the patch below?  (It doesn't look like it's
>    been checked in.)
> 
> It is checked in.  Problems with a sticky tag?  Or perhaps you
> couldn't find the ChangeLog entry?  Since mi-support.exp has the lines
> 
> # Local variables: 
> # change-log-default-name: "../gdb.mi/ChangeLog-mi"
> # End: 
> 
> Emacs put the entry in the entry in a somehwat unobvious place.  I
> left it there assuming the intention was to keep all MI-related stuff
> together.

Yeah.  It's the ChangeLog location that confused me.

Thanks,

Kevin