From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [PATCH RFC] Protoize values.c, varobj.c Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 21:21:00 -0000 Message-id: <1001108052055.ZM20567@ocotillo.lan> X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00085.html More protoization... * values.c (value_being_returned, using_struct_return): Protoize. * varobj.c (child_exists, cplus_class_num_children): Protoize. Index: values.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/values.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 values.c --- values.c 2000/10/30 15:32:51 1.10 +++ values.c 2000/11/08 05:16:31 @@ -1466,12 +1466,9 @@ 0 when it is using the value returning conventions (this often means returning pointer to where structure is vs. returning value). */ +/* ARGSUSED */ value_ptr -value_being_returned (valtype, retbuf, struct_return) - register struct type *valtype; - char *retbuf; - int struct_return; - /*ARGSUSED */ +value_being_returned (struct type *valtype, char *retbuf, int struct_return) { register value_ptr val; CORE_ADDR addr; @@ -1530,13 +1527,10 @@ is the type returned by the function. GCC_P is nonzero if compiled with GCC. */ +/* ARGSUSED */ int -using_struct_return (function, funcaddr, value_type, gcc_p) - value_ptr function; - CORE_ADDR funcaddr; - struct type *value_type; - int gcc_p; - /*ARGSUSED */ +using_struct_return (value_ptr function, CORE_ADDR funcaddr, + struct type *value_type, int gcc_p) { register enum type_code code = TYPE_CODE (value_type); Index: varobj.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/varobj.c,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 varobj.c --- varobj.c 2000/11/06 23:12:29 1.11 +++ varobj.c 2000/11/08 05:16:35 @@ -1216,9 +1216,7 @@ /* Does a child with the name NAME exist in VAR? If so, return its data. If not, return NULL. */ static struct varobj * -child_exists (var, name) - struct varobj *var; /* Parent */ - char *name; /* name of child */ +child_exists (struct varobj *var, char *name) { struct varobj_child *vc; @@ -2156,9 +2154,7 @@ That means we need to descend into all baseclasses and find out how many are there, too. */ static void -cplus_class_num_children (type, children) - struct type *type; - int children[3]; +cplus_class_num_children (struct type *type, int children[3]) { int i;