From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40226 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2019 16:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 40213 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2019 16:06:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:682 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:06:27 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 173F41E78E; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:06:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A571E182; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:06:25 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:06:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tom@tromey.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Add styling to the gdb CLI and TUI In-Reply-To: <834l7wushq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181128001435.12703-1-tom@tromey.com> <83k1kxfzwo.fsf@gnu.org> <8736rja4i8.fsf@tromey.com> <83r2brhw8k.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8cmh1wg.fsf@tromey.com> <83va12gz8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87mumeb935.fsf@tromey.com> <83d0n8eyzw.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0n6adk2.fsf@tromey.com> <83imwyee29.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0n67d29.fsf@tromey.com> <83imwwc7pj.fsf@gnu.org> <57558f60-8254-931f-846b-bdd6b60f5798@simark.ca> <838sx8uwbb.fsf@gnu.org> <834l7wushq.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <0f1760b45f024d45ceece8f0fe5c2686@simark.ca> X-Sender: simark@simark.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 On 2019-03-21 12:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:02:00 -0400 >> From: Simon Marchi >> Cc: tom@tromey.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> > I don't have a strong opinion, but I do have a weak one: the decimal >> > "encoding" makes it much easier for humans to construct version >> > numbers, they don't need to convert to hex. >> >> There's not much difference in hex, you would just write "if >> $_gdb_version >= 0x0901" for example, rather than "if $_gdb_version >= >> 901". > > That's true for small values of major/minor. But imagine GDB 12.13 > for a moment. Hmm, true :). Simon