Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Franco de Carvalho <pedromfc@linux.ibm.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com, edjunior@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f08d344-7096-c9fc-6eed-0215d3f63001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wosqntwa.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


-- 
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 08/16/2018 05:44 PM, Pedro Franco de Carvalho wrote:
> 
> Pedro Franco de Carvalho <pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> These are all the changes compared to V2, following the suggestions
>> there, and following the changes to linux-tdep.c:
>>
>> * Adapted "Zero-initialize linux note sections" due to recent changes
>>   from commit a616bb9450.
>>
>> * Added a comment to "Zero-initialize linux note sections"
>>
>> * Adapted all the four main patches that enable the registers
>>   (PPR/DSCR, TAR, EBB/PMU and HTM) to account for the changes from
>>   commit a616bb9450.
>>
>> * De-duplicated testcase names.  Changed a few of the test names so
>>   that they are environment-independent.  Fixed a few other minor
>>   issues with the testcases.
>>
>> * Changed one of the testcases for the HTM registers so that it
>>   XFAILs.  This testcase occasionally failed, possibly due to a kernel
>>   bug.
>>
>> * Fixed some of the formatting and const-correctness in "[PowerPC] Add
>>   support for HTM registers", in gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c.
>>
>> * Added an item in the NEWS file on the last commit, indicating all
>>   the newly supported registers from this series.
> 
> Considering Ulrich had already approved the V2 patches, do these changes
> need to be re-approved, or can they be considered as obvious, and can I
> commit them?
> 

I was reading through the series as you sent this.  I sent a couple
comments to patches #12 and #14.  The remarks in #12 is something that can
always be addressed with this series already merged.  Re. the comments for #14,
it would be nice to go over the series and add missing intro comments to
functions, etc.  Otherwise, it all LGTM.  I only really skimmed
it for mechanics, since as you say Ulrich already reviewed it, and I'm
far from a Power expert anyway.

> I don't know if a NEWS item counts as obvious, but if not, I can submit
> it in a separate patch.

It's usually reviewed like other patches.  gdb/NEWS falls under
Eli's documentation maintainership.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-16 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-15  0:07 Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] [PowerPC] Reject tdescs with VSX and no FPU or Altivec Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] [PowerPC] Add support for TAR Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] Add decfloat registers to float reggroup Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] [PowerPC] Fix indentation in arch/ppc-linux-common.c Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] [PowerPC] Fix two if statements in gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] [PowerPC] Remove rs6000_pseudo_register_reggroup_p Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] [PowerPC] Don't zero-initialize vector register buffers Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] [PowerPC] Refactor have_ initializers in rs6000-tdep.c Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] [PowerPC] Add support for EBB and PMU registers Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 16:51   ` Pedro Alves
2018-08-16 18:16     ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:07 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] Zero-initialize linux note sections Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  0:55 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 16:53   ` Pedro Alves
2018-08-16 17:50     ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 20:16       ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 23:47         ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-17 18:11           ` Pedro Alves
2018-08-17 19:25             ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-15  1:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] [PowerPC] Add support for PPR and DSCR Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 16:46 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 17:00   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-08-16 17:42     ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 18:02       ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-16 18:08         ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-08-16 18:45           ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-16 19:23             ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-10-08 19:09     ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2018-10-08 19:32       ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f08d344-7096-c9fc-6eed-0215d3f63001@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=edjunior@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedromfc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox