Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: When attaching, add process before lwps
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e75277b-fa80-129d-e82b-3f854bb33124@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190125104834.2595-1-alan.hayward@arm.com>

On 01/25/2019 10:48 AM, Alan Hayward wrote:
> The recent BP/WP changes for AArch64 swapping the order in add_lwp()
> so that the process was added before the lwp. This was due to the lwp
> creation requiring the process data.
> 
> This also needs changing in linux_attach().
> 
> Fixes gdb.server/ext-attach.exp on Aarch64.
> 
> (This regression was hidden due to the racy nature of the gdb.server
> tests - now they are no longer racy it'll be easier to spot. Also
> checked X86).
> 
> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2019-01-25  Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>
> 
> 	* linux-low.c (linux_attach): Add process before lwp.

> ---
>  gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> index 17cce24d76..1ab2cfb1eb 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> @@ -1188,6 +1188,8 @@ linux_attach (unsigned long pid)
>    ptid_t ptid = ptid_t (pid, pid, 0);
>    int err;
>  
> +  proc = linux_add_process (pid, 1);
> +
>    /* Attach to PID.  We will check for other threads
>       soon.  */
>    err = linux_attach_lwp (ptid);
> @@ -1198,8 +1200,6 @@ linux_attach (unsigned long pid)
>        error ("Cannot attach to process %ld: %s", pid, reason.c_str ());
>      }
>  
> -  proc = linux_add_process (pid, 1);
> -

This fails to consider the error conditions.  That error call
visible above throws an exception.

- If GDBserver is already attached to the process, this will
  create another process_info object for the already-attached
  process, and leave it behind.

  For this case, it would seem better to check whether we're
  already attached to a given PID in common code, around
  server.c:attach_inferior.

- If GDBserver isn't already attached, but the attach fails,
  this will likewise leave a stale process_info object behind.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-25 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-25 10:48 Alan Hayward
2019-01-25 18:23 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-02-01 11:20   ` Alan Hayward
     [not found]     ` <93ef0362-677a-4353-5942-d987a985e403@redhat.com>
2019-02-01 12:50       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e75277b-fa80-129d-e82b-3f854bb33124@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox