From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: lrn1986@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix compilation using mingw.org's MinGW
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d75e646-1030-9047-f4a5-0b5a881bfbfd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83r29jqtmi.fsf@gnu.org>
On 4/30/19 6:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> But no matter where it is set, it must be defined after _any_
>>> standard header is included, so in practice I think it's defined at
>>> the place where the patch tests for it.
>> I think you mean "before".
> No, I meant "after". The default value is set once you included at
> least on standard header. Hence you can at that place test for
> whether it is defined and what is its default value.
Sorry, but no, there's no need to wait until there's a default to
override it.
In fact, your patch is doing exactly that. common-defs.h is garanteed
to be included before any started header. That's exactly why I suggested
that spot.
That's because the default is only defined if not already defined:
/* Select Default WIN32_WINNT Value */
#if !defined(_WIN32_WINNT) && !defined(_CHICAGO_)
#define _WIN32_WINNT _WIN32_WINNT_WS03
#endif
This family of macros is usually defined on the command line / Makefile
on Windows-only projects, even:
$CC -D_WIN32_WINNT=xxx
That's what MSVC/Visual Studio does. Or at least, used to last I used it,
years ago.
I did not suggest doing that because it's not as convenient on portable
projects that don't just target Windows.
> Overriding that
> default is generally important only before including w32api headers,
> such as windows.h.
Agreed. But defining it really early just makes sure it's consistently
set.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-18 15:36 Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-18 17:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-04-18 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-18 20:38 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-04-19 6:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-18 17:20 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-18 17:22 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-18 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-19 10:51 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-19 11:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-19 11:33 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-28 14:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-30 12:56 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-30 13:06 ` LRN
2019-04-30 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-30 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-30 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-30 17:26 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-30 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-30 17:58 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
[not found] ` <83o94nqr4g.fsf@gnu.org>
2019-04-30 18:38 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-30 17:50 ` LRN
2019-04-30 13:10 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-30 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-30 16:31 ` Pedro Alves
2019-05-03 8:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-03 8:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d75e646-1030-9047-f4a5-0b5a881bfbfd@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lrn1986@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox