From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80189 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2016 19:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 80173 invoked by uid 89); 17 Nov 2016 19:20:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=baldwin, thumbs, Baldwin X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:20:43 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 33) id DF7A81E93D; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:20:41 -0500 (EST) To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Makefile improvements and cleanups X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:20:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <29640938.kQM7iLB2ip@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <20161113034625.8237-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <29640938.kQM7iLB2ip@ralph.baldwin.cx> Message-ID: <0d34e13186bacb7e247d2c93e5688a06@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 On 2016-11-17 13:54, John Baldwin wrote: > Are you still planning to push patch 4? I don't currently have any > pending > patches to the files you have renamed though I do have pending MIPS > patches > for FreeBSD which are new files (and if you are going to move forward > with > this I might as well rename them to use the new style of names now). Hi John, I am planning to refresh patches 3 and 4 and send a v2 soon. Just to get an idea, what is your opinion about this change? Thumbs down, sideways or up? It's a patch that makes things marginally better, but that has a big potential of conflicts for those who carry patches (i.e. you), so I'd like to know what you think. Thanks, Simon