From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101042 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2019 16:18:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 101031 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2019 16:18:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=him X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:18:35 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x09GISC0026292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:18:33 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5FBD31E7BB; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:18:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085A71E4A3; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:18:27 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:18:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Eli Zaretskii , Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: Remove support for old mangling schemes In-Reply-To: <83d0p5izaq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190108232208.17487-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <20190109045032.2146-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <83h8ehj0wi.fsf@gnu.org> <0da7933d5fb99c0c390acb5482cdcde7@polymtl.ca> <83d0p5izaq.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <0cac57fee1e9b4d7b30f5939fbbc626c@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 On 2019-01-09 11:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:59:14 -0500 >> From: Simon Marchi >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> > Are we removing 'auto' as well? If not, why do we want to un-document >> > it? >> >> I decided to remove the list of possible values and refer to the >> in-process help, this way we don't have to keep it up to date (as you >> might notice, the list was incomplete). But since the value "auto" is >> special, I agree we should mention it. Is it fine if I add this >> sentence? > > Yes, thanks. Thanks. I'll just wait for the confirmation from Keith that v2 is ok with him before pushing. Simon