From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10538 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2012 09:00:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10512 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2012 09:00:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:00:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484F629004E; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:00:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Skl-3DXlWcNn; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:00:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3695F29004A; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:00:28 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] libunwind/ia64: Rename libunwind-frame.[ch] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <201203060843.q268h5JN006761@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:00:00 -0000 Cc: palves@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0EAB4374-907D-4ACD-85F6-089DB5E22BA8@adacore.com> References: <20120304215728.GA2763@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F55C2BB.7090205@redhat.com> <201203060843.q268h5JN006761@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> To: Mark Kettenis X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 On Mar 6, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:54:35 +0000 >> From: Pedro Alves >>=20 >> In patch #1 rename libunwind-frame.h -> ia64-tdep-libunwind-frame.h >=20 > BTW, is it just me, or do other people think as well that > ia64-tdep-libunwin-frame.h is an awfully long name? Yes, it is but I am unable to find a better shorter one=85 Tristan.