From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9533 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 19:29:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9469 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 19:28:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out2.apple.com) (17.254.0.51) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2002 19:28:58 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2MJSva15994 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:28:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv3.apple.com (scv3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:28:57 -0800 Received: from inghji (inghji.apple.com [17.202.40.220]) by scv3.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2MJSvX07592; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:28:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:29:00 -0000 Subject: Re: add set cp-abi command Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz From: Jim Ingham In-Reply-To: <20020322140939.A26911@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: <0D8E655A-3DCB-11D6-92C9-000393540DDC@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:04:08PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >>> (or something like that; eliminating the \-return, which gcc3 I >>> thought >>> would warn about...) >> >> FYI, gcc has problems with: >> >> this is a string >> that goes across several lines. >> >> but not: >> >> this is a string\n\ >> that goes across several lines Right, this one was the version that was always sure to work... > > Oh, that was it. In any case, I prefer using implicit string > concatenation, since it doesn't mess up indentation as much. Not a problem. There must have been some compiler from back in my dim past that choked on the implicit concatenation, 'cause whenever I see it it still sends chills up my spine. But since I can't even remember when & where, and it is somewhat more readable, I can go with it. Now for the texinfo change... Jim -- Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com Developer Tools - gdb Apple Computer