From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27545 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2010 09:05:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27450 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2010 09:05:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:05:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C950DCB021C; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:05:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uCIB6fcadUQe; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:05:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B642ECB01F4; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:05:33 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [RFC] Darwin: add OSO as separate debug files Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:05:00 -0000 Cc: Tristan Gingold , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0777751C-F4F2-477A-A734-F547889F9ECE@adacore.com> References: <20100105113232.GA11052@chinon.act-europe.fr> To: tromey@redhat.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 On Jan 6, 2010, at 8:18 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tristan" =3D=3D Tristan Gingold writes: >=20 > Tristan> in order to correctly handle Darwin OSO files, they are now adde= d as > Tristan> separate debug objfile. > Tristan> This is the Darwin specific use of the previous patch. >=20 > I read through this and didn't see anything obviously objectionable. > I don't know anything about Darwin, though, so I think you will have to > self-approve. Thanks. Tristan.