Re: [Patch] arch recognition fix for osabi.c

["Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>]

Daniel, did you have any further spare brain cycles to consider my argument?

cheers,

Kris

> > > Changelog:
> > >     * osabi.c (gdbarch_init_osabi): Just check arch for compatability
> rather
> > > identicality.
> >
> > Your mailer is eating indentation again...
>
> Yeah.  It's fine in the editor - it's the cut and paste to Outlook that
> buggers it.
>
> > This half I'm not convinced by.  From our previous exchange I don't
> > think you've fully justified it.  Not approved without more discussion.
>
> Okay.  Let's use mips as an example.  The 'compatible' check returns true
if
> they have the same arch (ie. bfd_arch_mips).  There will be many different
> values for the arch_info pointer, all with bfd_arch_mips and various other
> pieces of info such as which machine type (10k, 4300, etc.) of mips it is.
> The handler was registered for bfd_arch_mips with no other information.
In
> the absence of the ABILITY to do anything smarter, we have to assume that
if
> the handler is for bfd_arch_mips, it should be run.
>
> As it stands, if the bfd reads a file and says 'this is a tx3900' or some
> such, the pointers won't be the same and my backend init_abi won't be run
> even though I want it to run for all mips targets.
>
> > >       (generic_elf_osabi_sniff_abi_tag_sections): Add check for QNX
> Neutrino
> > > binaries.
> >
> > This bit looks fine, except for two things: you've missed the coding
> > standards by four space characters (before left parens), and your
> > "safety first" check overruns the buffer (missing +1 in the alloca).
>
> Doh!  Not very safe was it?  Sorry about that.  Fixed.
>
> cheers,
>
> Kris
>
>
>