From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12964 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2009 10:45:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 12930 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2009 10:45:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_22,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:45:07 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2075A26EF09; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:45:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polhem (unknown [62.20.90.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF3B26EE8A; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:45:03 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: "'Greg Law'" , "'Michael Snyder'" Cc: "'Pedro Alves'" , "'Eli Zaretskii'" , References: <4A9C2AD3.5070904@vmware.com> <837hwia96c.fsf@gnu.org> <4AA32E36.1020709@vmware.com> <200909072229.46597.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4AA586A3.20907@vmware.com> <4AA60A58.7080205@undo-software.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA60A58.7080205@undo-software.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add 'reverse' capability query to remote protocol (qSupported). Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <030201ca313a$9660f040$c322d0c0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > > [...] it > > would mean that anybody with a deployed target that doesn't yet > > support the new "qSupported" probe would have to make his users > > enable them by hand. > > > > (why I cc:ed Jakob and Greg.) > > From our side we're fine with it defaulting to off and we'll add support > for new probe (we haven't released anything yet, so it's fine). I agree that it makes sense to default to off. To support gdb7, we will need to update our side anyway. So there is no point in trying to be nice. Better to fail early and fail often, as far as I am concerned. /jakob