RE: reverse for GDB/MI

Jakob Engblom
2009-02-06T13:56:58Z

> > Also, changing to variants would require rewriting code that we already
> > have in place and hvae tested (at least to some extent), and doing that
> > always strikes me as inviting problems and extra work.
>
> Well, I don't remember that the design for MI reverse support was ever posted
> to this list. If it were, you'd receive these comments before writing the code
> :-)

The patch for the MI commands was the implementation I mention, and it seems that it has been used by Teawater as well for some kind of testing. We have also tested them out and used them for a quite a while, as a patch to gdb used with Simics. So in that sense, the MI commands are not newly invented, but rather a commit of something that we have been using for a few years already.

Best regards,

/jakob

_______________________________________________________

Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager

Virtutech Direct: +46 8 690 07 47
Drottningholmsvägen 22 Mobile: +46 709 242 646
11243 Stockholm Web: www.virtutech.com
Sweden
________________________________________________________