From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20257 invoked by alias); 15 May 2005 19:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19887 invoked from network); 15 May 2005 19:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 May 2005 19:44:19 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-75-75.inter.net.il [80.230.75.75]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id BFP64922 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 15 May 2005 22:44:00 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:48:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Ian Lance Taylor Message-ID: <01c55986$Blat.v2.4$2a6b6c20@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20050515170435.GB11855@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:35 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <01c55708$Blat.v2.4$cfc9f040@zahav.net.il> <20050512154716.GA3513@nevyn.them.org> <01c5570e$Blat.v2.4$1c533160@zahav.net.il> <20050512162453.GA5180@nevyn.them.org> <01c55732$Blat.v2.4$e9bd3640@zahav.net.il> <20050512205103.GB13519@nevyn.them.org> <01c5586c$Blat.v2.4$a7dfc720@zahav.net.il> <20050514141204.GA10684@nevyn.them.org> <01c558a0$Blat.v2.4$2b06ba40@zahav.net.il> <20050515170435.GB11855@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:35 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org > > > > bfd/ChangeLog: > > > 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii > > > > > > * configure.in: Add snprintf and vsnprintf to AC_CHECK_DECLS. > > > > These patches are approved, plus the change to libiberty/configure.ac > > which needs the obvious ChangeLog entry. Thanks. > > Eli, please mention regenerating configure in the ChangeLog. I didn't send patches for the (regenerated) configure and config.in. Should I do that, given that I cannot commit them anyway? > > > gdb/ChangeLog: > > > 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii > > > > > > * configure.ac: Add snprintf and vsnprintf to AC_CHECK_DECLS. > > > > I can't approve this one, but it looks fine to me. > > Eli can approve it himself; or I will :-) True; but given the problems in my original patch, I prefered to get this by you-all. > Same comment as above applies; please mention configure. (And config.in, right?) Will do.