From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39356-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26173 invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 23:22:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26088 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 23:22:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 23:22:21 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-254-105.inter.net.il [83.130.254.105])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id EIW00634 (AUTH halo1);
	Thu, 12 May 2005 02:22:09 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:27:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <01c5567f$Blat.v2.4$f5312080@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-reply-to: <20050511200716.GA4104@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Wed, 11 May 2005 16:07:17 -0400)
Subject: Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <01c55664$Blat.v2.4$45620fe0@zahav.net.il> <20050511200716.GA4104@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:07:17 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Couldn't you use a separate object directory on DOS, as IIRC we
> recommend everyone do?

That won't help in this case, since cp-names.o and cp-namespace.o will
also clash.  Or did I misunderstood what you mean?