From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8600 invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 06:56:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8574 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 06:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 06:56:15 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-254-105.inter.net.il [83.130.254.105]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EIS49726 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 11 May 2005 09:56:09 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:07:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <01c555f6$Blat.v2.4$406e1880@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: bug-readline@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20050510203127.GA10559@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 10 May 2005 16:31:28 -0400) Subject: Re: PATCH: Use getche on Win32 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200505092015.j49KFoPw028903@sethra.codesourcery.com> <01c55512$Blat.v2.4$85bf3480@zahav.net.il> <42804E09.9060508@codesourcery.com> <01c55598$Blat.v2.4$baecd3c0@zahav.net.il> <428113E4.9090807@codesourcery.com> <01c5559e$Blat.v2.4$1b76ee60@zahav.net.il> <20050510203127.GA10559@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:31:28 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Mark Mitchell , bug-readline@gnu.org, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > Well, since we are talking about Readline for GDB, and given the > > importance of SIGINT in GDB, I'd say at least Ctrl-C should work as > > expected. > > That's a whole different problem; there's no way to read characters > that will cause proper SIGINT delivery, since the times when GDB cares > about SIGINT are the times when it is not in readline. Is that really so? What about a completion attempt that went haywire, or a too long output to the screen? > > > I don't mind doing so; I was merely trying to make something useful > > > available as soon as possible. > > > > If it's important that the current CVS snapshots are available ASAP > > for MinGW users, even though one cannot interrupt the debuggee with > > Ctrl-C, then I don't mind that you check this into the GDB CVS, > > provided that it will be followed soon by more patches to take care of > > the above issues. > > I would prefer not to commit patches now that will require followup > patches Me neither. But Mark seemed to be saying that he wanted usable GDB as soon as possible, see above.