From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39314-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31914 invoked by alias); 9 May 2005 21:07:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31474 invoked from network); 9 May 2005 21:07:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 May 2005 21:07:02 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-243-144.inter.net.il [83.130.243.144])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id BEI45314 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 10 May 2005 00:06:57 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:22:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <01c554da$Blat.v2.4$cf4f1f80@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200505091725.j49HPtK4022805@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message
	from Mark Kettenis on Mon, 9 May 2005 19:25:55 +0200 (CEST))
Subject: Re: [COMMIT/RFC] Always include <sys/types.h> from defs.h
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References:  <200505091725.j49HPtK4022805@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 19:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> 
> Raises the question whether we should move towards eliminating
> <sys/types.h> from all other GDB source files.  What do folks think
> about that?

I don't think it's necessary.  It could even do harm if one day we
decide to remove this line from defs.h.