Re: [RFA] Get rid of xm-go32.h (was: [COMMIT] Get rid of xm-cygwin.h)

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-12T12:42:00Z

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:55:30AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 13:14:08 +0300
> > From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
> > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 10:07:09 +0200
> > > From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
> > > CC: eliz@gnu.org
> > >
> > > Eli, any chance you can get rid of xm-go32.h too?
> >
> > Chance, yes. We have a public holiday coming up, I hope I will have
> > time to finally keep my promise to Andrew.
>
> The holiday came, and here's what I have in my sandbox. Is this way
> of solving the issue of non-standard init file names is acceptable?
> If so, I will commit the changes.
>
> Note that tm-cisco.h and tm-os68k.h override the standard definition
> of GDBINIT_FILENAME. Should we switch those platforms to the dynamic
> initialization as well?

FWIW, I like this solution.

Do we still need either of those targets? I haven't seen reports of
anyone using them in the time I've been a GDB developer.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC