From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7951 invoked by alias); 5 May 2005 04:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7412 invoked from network); 5 May 2005 04:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 May 2005 04:08:09 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-245-224.inter.net.il [83.130.245.224]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EHJ49605 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 5 May 2005 07:07:58 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 04:08:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <01c55127$Blat.v2.4$d74dc620@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: <20050504233411.GK30075@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Wed, 4 May 2005 19:34:11 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503195650.GD25356@white> <01c55025$Blat.v2.4$00e755e0@zahav.net.il> <20050503213911.GB16440@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <01c55061$Blat.v2.4$5a644e20@zahav.net.il> <20050504114821.GA27168@white> <20050504145535.GJ24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050504175802.GY24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <01c550e9$Blat.v2.4$378fcc20@zahav.net.il> <20050504233411.GK30075@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 19:34:11 -0400 > From: Christopher Faylor > > But lrealpath is presumably used in the gcc and binutils mingw ports > isn't it? I don't know. But even if it does, I suggest to change the Windows branch to produce forward slashes. Trouble will happen when you pass the result to some shell command and the shell happens to be Bash. It's not safe, so it's not good engineering, IMHO.