From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] Use bfd_byte in value.h
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 19:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c54f4a$Blat.v2.4$a9fc8500@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42755FD4.8000009@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 01 May 2005 19:01:40 -0400)
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:01:40 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> The suggestion of gdb_byte was yours, so it rightfully falls to you to
> propose more formally on gdb@ (I certaintly don't want to jump in and
> steal your thunder). Can we finally do that?
I will happily do whatever it takes, but I'm unsure what you want me
to say there. That I propose to replace "char *" with "gdb_byte *"?
Somehow, I doubt that this is all you read into ``propose formally''.
But if all you are asking is to start a thread on gdb@, I'll do this.
In any case, I think Mark's question (why not use "void *") is
something that we should discuss first, since if we accept his
recommendation, there will be no need to introduce a new data type.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-02 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-28 16:27 Andrew Cagney
2005-04-28 19:19 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-28 19:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-28 22:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-04-29 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-01 20:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-01 20:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-05-01 21:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-01 23:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-02 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-05-03 14:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-05-03 19:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 20:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c54f4a$Blat.v2.4$a9fc8500@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox