From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26023 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2005 03:55:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25891 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 03:55:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 03:55:11 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-41-251.inter.net.il [80.230.41.251]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EFU28202 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:53:50 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:55:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Mark Kettenis Message-ID: <01c54a13$Blat.v2.4$8017bac0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: mark@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200504252228.j3PMS8iR028118@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:28:08 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org> <426C3270.4050608@codesourcery.com> <20050425042414.GA7322@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050425131611.GA7821@nevyn.them.org> <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <426D05D6.8010903@codesourcery.com> <20050425150422.GA13753@nevyn.them.org> <426D0A11.4060604@codesourcery.com> <20050425152324.GA15521@nevyn.them.org> <426D0C1D.8040600@codesourcery.com> <20050425153549.GA15967@nevyn.them.org> <426D5178.6010502@codesourcery.com> <01c549da$Blat.v2.4$626aed00@zahav.net.il> <426D6518.9050305@codesourcery.com> <200504252158.j3PLwK6B031670@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <426D6A6E.1020505@codesourcery.com> <200504252228.j3PMS8iR028118@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:28:08 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > CC: eliz@gnu.org, drow@false.org, me@cgf.cx, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > So, is it OK to submit readline patches here? > > I'd say, please make an effort to get them into the official readline > first. That's true in general, but perhaps if we saw the readline patches first, we could give a more sound advice, including which parts of the patch are unlikely to be accepted by upstream Readline maintainers, based on prior experience. (IIRC, the DJGPP port of GDB is one reason for local patches in Readline.)