From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38956-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18522 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 16:42:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18103 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 16:42:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 16:42:05 -0000
Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-41-251.inter.net.il [80.230.41.251])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id EFS37362 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:40:43 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:42:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Message-ID: <01c549b5$Blat.v2.4$78c7dec0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from
	Christopher Faylor on Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:50:23 -0400)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200504210549.j3L5n2nP027728@sirius.codesourcery.com> <01c546a1$Blat.v2.4$e03250c0@zahav.net.il> <4267F742.2090108@codesourcery.com> <01c546b0$Blat.v2.4$c193bb40@zahav.net.il> <20050421205617.GA13146@nevyn.them.org> <01c54713$Blat.v2.4$5d0b4ea0@zahav.net.il> <20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org> <426C3270.4050608@codesourcery.com> <20050425042414.GA7322@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050425131611.GA7821@nevyn.them.org> <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:50:23 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
> 
> >It is only the console handle - in the configuration that Mark's been
> >testing.
> 
> Ok...  So, is it acceptable to include a console-only implementation in
> event-loop.c?  I would think that it wasn't.

Unless a more general emulation can be coded with a reasonable amount
of work, I'd be prepared to go along with a console-only version.  We
could add something there that will abort if a non-console handle is
ever passed, if we want.