From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29150 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2005 05:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29018 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2005 05:53:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 05:53:58 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-84-228-241-130.inter.net.il [84.228.241.130]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id DZC05378 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:53:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:54:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <01c52dda$Blat.v2.4$0d3c4020@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: <20050314003824.GA16626@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:38:24 -0500) Subject: Re: RFC: First stab at breakpoints in multiple locations Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050314003824.GA16626@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:38:24 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > This patch (which, obviously, I'm not proposing to commit) is an initial > prototype of the one breakpoint, many locations idea I've discussed before. Thanks (and sorry for the long response time). These changes, and the general method you propose to resolve these issues, are fine with me, but could you please explain the reason to also change seemingly unrelated places like symtab.c and linespec.c?