From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29042 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2005 19:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28838 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 19:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 19:50:04 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-84-228-249-95.inter.net.il [84.228.249.95]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id ATL06916 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:50:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-ID: <01c52a60$Blat.v2.4$b3d2f0a0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: mark@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050316152923.GA30681@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:29:23 -0500) Subject: Re: PATCH: Guard uses of fork Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200503100400.j2A4055p021369@sirius.codesourcery.com> <20050316152923.GA30681@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:29:23 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > I left the CANT_FORK define in place because that's defined by > > defs.h in the case __MSDOS__, and Dan says that configure isn't > > run in that case. Dan was wrong: the DJGPP (a.k.a. MSDOS) build does run the configure script, albeit slightly edited (see config/djgpp/djconfig.sh for the gory details). The reason why defs.h defines CANT_FORK for the __MSDOS__ build is that the DJGPP library does have `fork', but it's a stub that always fails, and I don't want to depend on the configure script to get this right.