From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7971 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 20:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7900 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 20:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 20:55:57 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-209-13.inter.net.il [83.130.209.13]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AOB60652 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:55:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:32:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: "M.M. Kettenis" Message-ID: <01c51469$Blat.v2.4$e96bb9c0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: cagney@gnu.org, kettenis@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <7319934860044785@weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl> (m.m.kettenis@alumnus.utwente.nl) Subject: Re: [RFA] Use TRY_CATCH in wrapper.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <7319934860044785@weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl> X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 > From: "M.M. Kettenis" > Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:30:00 +0000 > > > > Am I right in assuming that TRY_CATCH was added to make things like > > > this possible? It sure cleans things up up ;-). > > > > Yes, exactly. These cleanups, assuming before/after test results are > > identical, should be treated as obvious. > > Thanks. > > I was a bit confused since only the function in exceptions.c used the stuff. I think there's another reason why you were confused: because TRY_CATCH is not documented in gdbint.texinfo.