From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31893 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 19:21:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31259 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 19:21:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 19:21:18 -0000 Received: from zaretski (tony04-57-217.inter.net.il [80.230.57.217]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AMX91301 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:20:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:27:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c50edb$Blat.v2.4$c49430c0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: troth@openavr.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <420A5B67.8010605@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:50:15 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Texinfo build errors Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <420A5B67.8010605@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:50:15 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > It's definitly better than not building (checking the nightly snaps it > seems they also barf with the same error). I'd commit it is obvious for > that reason. I'm at a loss why you couldn't wait for my approval (which was just given). Do I have a reputation of a slow patch reviewer?