From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26519 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2005 04:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26310 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2005 04:40:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2005 04:40:19 -0000 Received: from zaretski (tony05-71-106.inter.net.il [80.230.71.106]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AIG35692 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:38:45 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 04:40:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Jim Blandy Message-ID: <01c4fea9$Blat.v2.4$9aa5c5e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: drow@false.org, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, scottb@netwinder.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 19 Jan 2005 16:35:53 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: fix rdi-share subdir selection in configure Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050119204129.GA13535@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 > Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Scott Bambrough , > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 19 Jan 2005 16:35:53 -0500 > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > Two problems. > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:31:39PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > gdb_target=embed > > > ! build_rdi_share=yes > > > > My mailer says you've got the whitespace disease. > > Hmm. I think I've fixed that. What's the rule? Just to leave what > one found unchanged, or to always use tabs, or to never use tabs? I don't think it's important, as long as we don't have any mandatory rules. It's IMHO impractical to request contributors to preserve the whitespace convention of every file they change.