From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9201 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2004 21:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9151 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2004 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2004 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from zaretski (tony06-90-45.inter.net.il [80.230.90.45]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DIE80879 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:49:15 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:08:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4e094$Blat.v2.2.2$90a48820@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: schwab@suse.de, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41BC9075.3090802@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:39:49 -0500) Subject: Re: i18n, part 2 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041204195702.GA25306@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <20041206103930.6bca4814.kevinb@redhat.com> <01c4dbd5$Blat.v2.2.2$98515300@zahav.net.il> <20041206155114.6bab8d59.kevinb@redhat.com> <01c4dc19$Blat.v2.2.2$c62c4660@zahav.net.il> <20041207095217.5a7dae23.kevinb@redhat.com> <01c4dc94$Blat.v2.2.2$11a038c0@zahav.net.il> <41BC9075.3090802@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:39:49 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Kevin Buettner , > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > This happens automatically with --add-comments. > > and is already used when generating the gdb.pot file. Sounds like we > just need to make better use of that feature. Unless there's a better alternative, which I'm still looking for. Please be patient. Btw, even if we decide to use --add-comments, we still need to add the comments that explain the context for these one-word messages. So the patch will need tio be revised anyhow. (I guess I'm nervous to see this patch committed some day without waiting for this discussion to come to a consensus ;-)