From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-37333-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15972 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2004 20:52:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15879 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 20:52:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 20:52:40 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.156.125])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR)
	with ESMTP id DWX22279 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:51:51 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:59:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <01c4dbd5$Blat.v2.2.2$98515300@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20041206103930.6bca4814.kevinb@redhat.com> (message from Kevin
	Buettner on Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:39:30 -0700)
Subject: Re: i18n, part 2
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20041204195702.GA25306@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <20041206103930.6bca4814.kevinb@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:39:30 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:57:02 +0100
> Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> wrote:
> 
> > * aix-thread.c:aix_thread_extra_thread_info()
> > 
> >   "tid %d, %s" doesn't add much context to ", suspended". Besides,
> >   splitting the execution flow with if (tid != PTHDB_INVALID_TID) would
> >   not be identical to the current code. That is why I left the code as
> >   is.
> 
> Seems reasonable.

Excuse me, but in what language is this ``reasonable''?  In any
language where ``suspended'' needs to be modified according to the
gender (masculine, feminine, etc.) of the corresponding noun, the
translator will have no hope of getting the translation right without
reading the code and understanding what it does.  So much for
``reasonable''.