From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18459 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 17:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17687 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 17:34:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 17:34:22 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.51]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DDB77919 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:33:26 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:35:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Message-ID: <01c4cccb$Blat.v2.2.2$5da15ca0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041115143217.20c9a6a2@saguaro> (message from Kevin Buettner on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:32:17 -0700) Subject: Re: Assume solib.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il> <20041115143217.20c9a6a2@saguaro> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:32:17 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > Would the addition of the attached file (solib-null.c) to Andrew's patch > address your concerns? Anything that prevents breaking of ports that currently work without solib will address my concerns. However, I admit that the intricacies of shared library support in GDB is not something I consider myself an expert in, so Mark would be a better person to answer this.