From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5368 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 04:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4985 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 04:52:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 04:52:13 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.147.231]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DWF32444 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:51:50 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:52:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4cc60$Blat.v2.2.2$fa9aeb40@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <419A7EC5.2040606@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:17 -0500) Subject: Re: Assume solib.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il> <419942CB.4000905@gnu.org> <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$fc133040@zahav.net.il> <419A2742.8070804@gnu.org> <01c4cc1e$Blat.v2.2.2$c820e260@zahav.net.il> <419A7EC5.2040606@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:27:17 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > So how well established my assertion is depends on who you'd prefer to > believe. Please re-read the text that I cited in my response, and you will see that I was reacting to an entirely different part of your and Mark's exchange. Anyway, I don't understand what is your point. In another message in this thread you were complaining about the futility of the discussion, and yet you yourself start futile sub-threads that have nothing to do with the issue at hand.