From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-36969-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16610 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2004 20:54:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16321 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 20:54:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 20:54:05 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.147.231])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id DCU40389 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:53:59 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:54:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <01c4cc1e$Blat.v2.2.2$3a467e00@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200411160836.iAG8auV2000625@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message
	from Mark Kettenis on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:36:56 +0100 (CET))
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il> <419942CB.4000905@gnu.org> <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$fc133040@zahav.net.il> <200411160836.iAG8auV2000625@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:36:56 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
> CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
>    Like Daniel, I consider "supported" any target for which GDB builds
>    and works, and which is not declared deprecated.
> 
> Hmm, personally I think that's a bit too broad.  I consider a system
> "supported" if there is someone who is more or less actively tracking
> GDB development, making sure that GDB keeps working on a particular
> target.

That's the same thing in different words: if a target is not actively
maintained, it will bitrot and stop building after a very short time.