From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-36911-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4875 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2004 09:01:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2356 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2004 09:01:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2004 09:01:07 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.154.12])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR)
	with ESMTP id DWB81219 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:59:35 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:01:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <01c4c95e$Blat.v2.2.2$f59e0820@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: alain@qnx.com, bob@brasko.net, nick@nick.uklinux.net,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <41953FDA.7030708@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 12
	Nov 2004 17:57:30 -0500)
Subject: Re: MI handshaking
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200411120344.WAA24018@smtp.ott.qnx.com> <41953FDA.7030708@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:57:30 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>,
>         gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > =mi-handshake,versions=[mi1,mi2,mi3],stable=[mi2]
> 
> Yes, thanks for the correction with ``=''.   But not 
> ``versions=[mi1,mi2,mi3]'' that's too much and misleading information.
> 
> I think the objective here needs to be to provide as much information as 
> possible about what version of GDB and MI is running.  Hence the:
> 
> 	version="mi2"
> 
> (where hopefully VERSION version is a member of STABLE :-)

We've been through this discussion, and the only suggestion that
brought a consensus was to print all the supported MI versions, not
just one.  Let's not reopen that discussion again, even if the result
looks ``too much and misleading''.  (Why ``misleading'', btw?)

> although strictly speaking it should probably be:
> 
> 	mi-version="mi2"

Yes, mi-version is better, IMO.