From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2146 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2004 21:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2128 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2004 21:28:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2004 21:28:38 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.143.17]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DVU45392 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:28:31 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:28:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Bob Rossi Message-ID: <01c4c2b4$Blat.v2.2.2$a21985e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041104195701.GA7296@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:57:01 -0500) Subject: Re: MI handshaking Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041104195701.GA7296@white> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:57:01 -0500 > From: Bob Rossi > > The one question I have is, should the documentation for this be in the > MI output syntax? or should there me a new field called > MI handshaking syntax? I'd prefer a new subsection right at the beginning of the GDB/MI description in the manual. That way, someone who designs a front end will see this stuff when she begins reading the docs.