From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6725 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2004 04:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6714 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2004 04:38:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2004 04:38:47 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.159.47]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CZV64182 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 06:38:37 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 04:38:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: David Lecomber Message-ID: <01c4c095$Blat.v2.2.2$3f440920@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <1099347096.31287.3.camel@cpc1-oxfd5-5-0-cust86.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> (message from David Lecomber on Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:11:36 +0000) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Seg fault whilst stepping when watch set [ping!] [in breakpoint.c] Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1097972182.22738.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1098720391.1935.0.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <1099347096.31287.3.camel@cpc1-oxfd5-5-0-cust86.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 > From: David Lecomber > Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:11:36 +0000 > > Two week ping!!!! This really is an obviously harmless patch, not > necessarily an obvious patch, but it's one that can only stop a segfault > that would otherwise happen, so could someone give the ok please.. Sorry, I missed the original post somehow. Can you post a short test program, preferably in C, that can be used to reproduce this problem? I don't think I've ever seen such crashes. TIA