From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 963 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2004 19:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 953 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 19:56:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 19:56:34 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.160]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CYK26971 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:53:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:56:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Baurjan Ismagulov Message-ID: <01c4bb94$Blat.v2.2.2$e804d040@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041026075409.GA21487@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> (message from Baurjan Ismagulov on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:54:11 +0300) Subject: Re: an i18n sample Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041024104805.GA2369@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <01c4b9ff$Blat.v2.2.2$1ebcb860@zahav.net.il> <417D76D5.9000105@gnu.org> <01c4bb18$Blat.v2.2.2$62f43fc0@zahav.net.il> <20041026075409.GA21487@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:54:11 +0300 > From: Baurjan Ismagulov > > That is why what I am working at right now is rewriting the output > within the function scope and leaving issues requiring global changes > for later. Thus, the first stage can be done relatively quickly and with > better quality than just with s/"\([^"]*\)"/_("\1")/g. I think this is a > reasonable compromise. That's a very good plan which I fully support. Thanks.