From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5790 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2004 10:05:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5777 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2004 10:05:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2004 10:05:46 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.122]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CXU13354 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:05:38 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:05:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Joel Brobecker Message-ID: <01c4b8e7$Blat.v2.2.2$5db7cfa0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041021210951.GZ21300@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:09:51 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve "start" command for Ada Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041021034759.GP21300@gnat.com> <01c4b72e$Blat.v2.2.2$b14feb80@zahav.net.il> <20041021210951.GZ21300@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:09:51 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > This is not clear enough: what does it mean ``the executable has > > changed''? Did its file name change? what if its the same program, > > but it was recompiled and its debugging session restarted? > > That's a very good point, which pointed at something I didn't consider > when I first wrote the patch: The signal needs to be sent when the > program has been recompiled, or course. Is this version better? Yes, much better; thanks. The Texinfo patch is approved.