From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25401 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 19:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25392 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 19:27:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 19:27:29 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.142.154]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CXD10456 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:39:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:27:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4b6d3$Blat.v2.2.2$9f97d8e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: jjohnstn@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41769FF3.7010801@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:27:15 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4175A9C9.8040300@redhat.com> <41769FF3.7010801@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:27:15 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > The controversy here appears to be with the target dependant code being > added to breakpoint.c. Is this really target-dependant? What happens on other targets that support threads and watchpoints?