From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16624 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2004 20:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16609 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2004 20:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 20:05:13 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-207-40.inter.net.il [80.230.207.40]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DVE58860 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:03:37 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:05:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-ID: <01c4b616$Blat.v2.2.2$48585220@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041019132315.GA20657@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:23:15 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/NEWS] GDB works with GCC -feliminate-dwarf2-dups. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4172B5F4.nailMEV1154GO@mindspring.com> <20041017183143.GA22628@nevyn.them.org> <4172BF74.nailMK41WRWF5@mindspring.com> <20041017191337.GA23601@nevyn.them.org> <4172D1FF.nailMO5211TI7@mindspring.com> <01c4b4cf$Blat.v2.2.2$1a0e6f00@zahav.net.il> <417423FA.nailP2L12S6AW@mindspring.com> <01c4b595$Blat.v2.2.2$2312b680@zahav.net.il> <20041019132315.GA20657@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:23:15 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Michael Chastain , > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > But, for the record, I chose the word deliberately; I don't know of > any other free compilers which produce it, but I do know of > compilers which are both commercial and proprietary which do so. The point is, GCC can be sold as part of a commercial package, as long as it isn't proprietary. > "non-GCC" would be just as accurate a bucket. Indeed.