From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11436 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2004 12:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11427 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 12:56:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 12:56:28 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.240]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CSL07289 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:56:24 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:56:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Joel Brobecker Message-ID: <01c4a6ec$Blat.v2.2.2$a7123ee0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: hilfingr@gnat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040928204125.GB1285@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:25 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on initial Ada support in GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040927103327.450A8F2C33@nile.gnat.com> <01c4a597$Blat.v2.2.2$990c9580@zahav.net.il> <20040928204125.GB1285@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:25 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Paul Hilfinger , > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Actually, it is the "Dispatching subprogram calls" that are not implemented. > Maybe we should rephrase it to "Calls to dispatching subprograms"? Some less ambiguous wording is necessary, yes.