From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16422 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2004 04:51:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16382 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 04:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 04:51:20 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.154.85]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CQJ48338 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:51:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:51:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Michael Chastain Message-ID: <01c4a128$Blat.v2.2.2$c700d1e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4151DEC4.nailKQ02QGXYU@mindspring.com> (message from Michael Chastain on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:21:24 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <01c49d82$Blat.v2.2.2$23875ec0@zahav.net.il> <200409191144.i8JBiSA7045711@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <01c49ec2$Blat.v2.2.2$834381e0@zahav.net.il> <4151DEC4.nailKQ02QGXYU@mindspring.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:21:24 -0400 > From: Michael Chastain > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > "rb" and "wb" are mentioned in "man fopen" on these systems: > > alphaev56-dec-osf4.0g > alphaev68-dec-osf5.1b > hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 > hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Did you find any systems where "rb" and "wb" are _not_ mentioned? > I'm cool with the wrapper-function idea. Thanks for the feedback.