From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-35774-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22673 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2004 19:43:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22664 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 19:43:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 19:43:24 -0000
Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-44.inter.net.il [80.230.194.44])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR)
	with ESMTP id COC27300 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:43:20 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:43:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <01c499c9$Blat.v2.2.2$deebfb60@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <4145AE6F.6070005@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 13
	Sep 2004 10:27:59 -0400)
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <413C6E8E.6030607@gnu.org> <01c49441$Blat.v2.2.2$ead61420@zahav.net.il> <413E25F6.7020908@gnu.org> <01c49557$Blat.v2.2.2$23f700a0@zahav.net.il> <413F170A.2070005@gnu.org> <01c495b7$Blat.v2.2.2$1f83c660@zahav.net.il> <20040908152315.GA28927@nevyn.them.org> <01c4961e$Blat.v2.2.2$d00fd3e0@zahav.net.il> <20040909035336.GA30215@nevyn.them.org> <01c49621$Blat.v2.2.2$eb2d05a0@zahav.net.il> <20040909124755.GA8559@nevyn.them.org> <01c4969e$Blat.v2.2.2$0e5a13c0@zahav.net.il> <414479DB.4090207@gnu.org> <01c498f8$Blat.v2.2.2$2c6144e0@zahav.net.il> <4145AE6F.6070005@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:27:59 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> I've committed this part of my change:

Great!  So you've gone out and committed a patch over an objection of
a core maintainer who worked quite a bit on the releated code.  What
next?  I revert the patch and we start a patch-reverting war?

Don't you see how your unilateral conduct leads us directly to where
none of us wants to go?