From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13431 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 16:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13424 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 16:16:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 16:16:39 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.187]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DUE64302 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:16:36 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:16:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Michael Chastain Message-ID: <01c49751$Blat.v2.2.2$85ca7680@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4141B12A.nail2461S2ZKE@mindspring.com> (message from Michael Chastain on Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:50:34 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/doco] deprecate.txt Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4141B12A.nail2461S2ZKE@mindspring.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:50:34 -0400 > From: Michael Chastain > > Here is a new file, gdb/testsuite/deprecate.txt. > > I think it's more useful to keep this file inside gdb/testsuite rather > than making it a section of doc/gdbint.texinfo . Eli, is that okay with > you? I won't fight you if you feel strongly about that, but let me ask: why do you think it is better to keep this file separate? My experience tells me that having several separate files is worse than having a single file.