From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6268 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2004 19:19:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6261 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 19:19:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 19:19:10 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.141.72]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CNA49901 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:18:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:19:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c496a1$Blat.v2.2.2$c9ea67e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <414073FE.90601@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:17:18 -0400) Subject: Re: [commit] Let {TM,XM,NM}_FILE specify a path Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41379AC6.90605@gnu.org> <01c491a7$Blat.v2.2.2$8cce1ae0@zahav.net.il> <41389DFA.5020104@gnu.org> <01c49274$Blat.v2.2.2$507011c0@zahav.net.il> <414073FE.90601@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:17:18 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > I've now prototyped this change vis: > TM_FILE -> TM_INCLUDE > NAT_FILE -> NM_INCLUDE (for consistency) > XM_FILE -> XM_INCLUDE > and found that it didn't help. > > TM_FILE specifies the name of the file that is linked to "tm.h". My > patch does not change this. It just removes a restriction on what could > be specified for that file. I still don't see why TM_INCLUDE isn't a better name, but if you feel strongly about keeping the current name, I won't object. TM_INCLUDE was just a suggestion, anyway.